Sunday, January 28, 2018

“The Lady ” of the West prefers to be a “discourteous oppressor” than “Democracy Icon”

By Aung Aung
Resignation of Veteran US diplomat Bill Richardson from an international panel set up by Myanmar leader Aung San Suu Kyi to advise on the Rohingya crisis, has shown a big picture of “Lady’s real attitude”.
Since 1988, millions of people at home and abroad have praised Suu Kyi as a “Democracy icon of Burma” but now, she has proved that she doesn’t want to be a democracy icon, rather she prefers to be a “discourteous oppressor”.
Bill Richardson claimed the panel was a “whitewash” and accused Ms Suu Kyi, his long-time friend, of lacking “moral leadership” but Myanmar accused him of pursuing “his own agenda”.

According to Suu Kyi’s ethical standard, Rohingya must be considered “inferior race” as Jews in Hitler’s era; they must be kept in the ghettos, National Verification is being prepared only for Rohingya to continue “State’s plan of Rohingya Genocide”

The West’s Lady has turned her face towards selfish Russia and China; two big enemies of human rights and human value on Earth. Discourteous oppressor doesn’t care concern of UN, US, EU and World Community. Her mission is “Buddhist racism” not democracy and human rights.

In every office of immigration, there is a “Buddhist racist slogan against non-Buddhist hanging on the wall using bold and large font of Burmese. Suu Kyi becomes hundred times worse than notorious dictator General Ne Win whose oppression against Rohingya is nothing compare to Suu Kyi’s genocidal oppression.

More than 650,000 Rohingya people fled to Bangladesh because of genocidal operation against them; gang rape, burnt alive, mass killing, burning and destruction of the whole Rohingya community in Rathedaung, Buthidaung and Maungdaw.


Ms Suu Kyi has supported Myanmar’s military for horrific human rights abuses against Rohingya and stubbornly resisted pressure to allow international organisations access to Rakhine state. Ms Suu Kyi’s attitude towards Rohingya crisis is a black spot in the history of “Nobel Committee”.