Dhaka Tribune
Forty-one eminent citizens of Bangladesh have called upon the government to respond positively to a plea filed with International Criminal Court (ICC) by one of its prosecutors seeking a ruling on whether the court has any authority to hold hearings on the offences committed against Rohingyas.
Don't forget to read:
Forty-one eminent citizens of Bangladesh have called upon the government to respond positively to a plea filed with International Criminal Court (ICC) by one of its prosecutors seeking a ruling on whether the court has any authority to hold hearings on the offences committed against Rohingyas.
Don't forget to read:
HRW
Report Burma events 2017: https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2018/country-chapters/burma
Methodical
Massacre at Rohingya Village: https://youtu.be/89ujUCRYL08
Widespread
Rape in the Ethnic Cleansing of Rohingya in Burma: https://youtu.be/oOCd-_sqGGM
A statement, signing
by the citizens April 9, was handed over to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on
Sunday, confirmed Shireen P Huq, a founding member of women’s rights
organization Naripokkho and one of the 41 citizens.
Following the
petition filed by ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda, the international court formed
a pre-trial chamber, which on May 7 urged Bangladesh to explain whether the
crimes committed by the Myanmar authorities against Rohingya Muslims fall
within its jurisdiction.
“A number of us have urged the Bangladesh
government to respond to the request from the International Criminal Court inviting
Bangladesh’s observations with regard to jurisdiction for investigation into
the mass ‘deportation’ of Rohingyas from Myanmar,” Shireen said.
“Bangladesh’s
positive response is a critical step towards claiming accountability for the
perpetration of atrocities against the Rohingyas in Myanmar and to ultimately
seek justice.”
Commending
Bensouda’s petition seeking a ruling from the ICC on whether it has
jurisdiction to investigate the expulsion of Rohingyas by Myanmar’s security
forces since August last year, the statement reads: “We call on the government
to respond [positively] to the invitation from ICC Pre-Trial Chamber to
Bangladesh to submit by 11 June its observations on the question and to support
the prosecutor’s request.
“We also urge the government
to support the views of the ICC prosecutor that the court may assert
jurisdiction over crimes committed by the Myanmar authorities… This will be an
important…step in ensuring justice for victims of the crimes against
humanity…in Myanmar.”
It further says: “We
believe the government of Bangladesh should provide the court with all
information in its possession about the circumstances surrounding the presence
of the Rohingya on its territory, as invited by the Pre-Trial Chamber.”
Bensouda in her petition
argued that the ICC may exercise jurisdiction over the affair because an
essential legal element of the crime of deportation, namely “crossing an
international border”, occurred on the territory of Bangladesh.
However, Dhaka has
yet to respond to the Pre-Trial Chamber’s request for its opinions.
Myanmar says won’t
accept ICC measures
U Zaw Htay, director
general of Myanmar’s Ministry of the State Counsellor’s Office, said they would
reject any efforts to refer Myanmar to the ICC, of which it is not a member,
over the conflicts in Rakhine, according to a statement available on the
website of the country’s President Office.
“The United Nations
has set a policy regarding the ICC, which says the court has jurisdiction only
in its member countries. The Vienna Convention on International Treaties states
that for a country to follow the 12 international agreements, it needs to first
be registered and verified before it can become a member state,” he reasoned.
“Bangladesh is a
member state of the ICC. The court asked for Bangladesh’s observations that
will be reviewed by three ICC judges. This is their process… The ICC cannot take actions against
non-member states. If they try to proceed with something that cannot be done,
we will not accept it.”
The 41
citizens
Transparency
International Bangladesh Executive Director Dr Iftekhar Zaman, Supreme Court
lawyers Dr Shahdeen Malik, Barrister Sara Hossain, Barrister JyotirmoyBarua and
Cynthia Farid, USA Illinois State University’s political science professor Dr
Ali Riaz, SHUJON- Citizens for Good Governance Secretary Dr Badiul Alam
Majumdar, Brac University’s Centre for Peace and Justice Executive Director
Barrister Manzoor Hasan, UBINIG (Policy Research for Development Alternative)
Executive Director Farida Akhter, Action Aid Bangladesh Country Director Farah
Kabir, DRIK Founder Dr Shahidul Alam, social activist Khushi Kabir, Bangladesh
Mahila Parishad President Ayesha Khanum, Shadhona Artistic Director Lubna
Marium, Women’s Rights Activist and Columnist Dr Maleka Begum, rights defenders
Dr Hameeda Hossain, Muktasree Chakma Sathi, Reza Lenin, Maheen Sultan and Md
Nur Khan Liton, Women’s Rights Organization Naripokkho’s founder member Shireen
P Huq, economist Dr Shapan Adnan, Nagorik Uddyog’s Chief Executive Zakir
Hossain, Visual Advocacy through Photography Campaigner Mahmud Rahman,
Gonoshasthaya Kendra CEO Dr Manzur Kadir Ahmed, COAST Executive Director Rezaul
Karim Chowdhury, rights and cultural activist Asif Munier, Dhaka University’s
(DU) sociology professor Dr Samina Lutfa, physician and health rights activist
Dr Zafrullah Chowdhury, Central Women’s University Vice Chancellor Prof Dr
Perween Hasan, the University of Oregon’s anthropology professor Dr Lamia
Karim, pediatrician Dr Naila Z Khan, the Institute of Informatics and
Development’s CEO Syeed Ahamed, University Press Limited’s Operations and
Business Development Director Mahrukh Mohiuddin, filmmaker Razia Quadir, London
Middlesex University’s PhD Student Manjida Ahamed and Geneva’s Graduate Institute
PhD student Quazi Omar Foysal, and DU law professors Dr Shahnaz Huda, Dr
Ridwanul Hoque, Dr Asif Nazrul, and Dr Sumaiya Khair.