Thu Thu Aung, Poppy Elena McPherson
The pre-trial hearings, which have been going on since
January, drew to a close on Monday as the prosecution presented its last
witness.
YANGON (Reuters) - A police witness in the case against
two Reuters reporters accused of possessing state secrets in Myanmar is
“unreliable,” the reporters’ lawyer said on Monday, because he obtained
testimony from previous witnesses, in violation of police code.
Prosecution witness Police Major Tin Win Maung, a senior
officer involved in the inquiry into the journalists, told the court he had
applied for copies of statements made by all other witnesses.
The court in Yangon is set to hear arguments from both
sides on July 2 on whether Wa Lone, 32, and his Reuters colleague Kyaw Soe Oo,
28, will be charged under the colonial-era Official Secrets Act, which carries
a maximum penalty of 14 years in prison.
During cross-examination, Tin Win Maung said he had
copied the statements because “he wanted to know more about the case” as an
investigating officer.
Defence lawyer Khin Maung Zaw said the police officer’s
actions were not illegal but violated a clause from the Burma Police Manual, a
set of rules governing police behaviour.
“He is not reliable because he has breached those police
regulations,” the lawyer told Reuters after the proceedings.
“The would-be witness must not know what the previous
witness has testified because he will prepare himself according to the
statements of the previous witnesses,” he said.
The code says when an officer is a witness in a case, “he
will not be present in the court while the inquiry or trial is proceeding”,
otherwise the magistrate may object to his evidence “on the ground that he has
heard all that the other witnesses have said, and will naturally adapt the
details of his narrative to theirs”.
Prosecutor Kyaw Min Aung declined to comment.
Police spokesman Myo Thu Soe did not immediately respond
to requests for comment.
Myanmar government spokesman Zaw Htay was not immediately
available for comment after Monday’s hearing. Previously, he has said Myanmar
courts were independent and the case would be conducted according to the law.
‘TRUTH WILL COME OUT’
At the time of their arrest in December, the reporters
had been working on an investigation into the killing of 10 Rohingya Muslim men
and boys in a village in western Myanmar’s Rakhine State. The killings took
place during a military crackdown that U.N. agencies say sent nearly 700,000
people fleeing to Bangladesh.
The reporters have told relatives they were arrested
almost immediately after being handed some rolled up papers at a restaurant in
northern Yangon by two policemen they had not met before, having been invited
to meet the officers for dinner.
On Monday, defence lawyers said the prosecution had
failed to establish how the alleged documents had come into the reporters’
possession.
“In the law, in the Official Secrets Act, it is said that
these documents, those official secret documents, must be obtained,” Khin Maung
Zaw said. “They cannot prove that they were obtained.”
In April, Police Captain Moe Yan Naing testified that a
senior officer had ordered his subordinates to plant secret documents on Wa
Lone to “trap” the reporter.
Senior police officials have dismissed the testimony as
untruthful.
After his court appearance, Moe Yan Naing was sentenced
to a year in jail for violating police discipline and his family was evicted
from police housing. Police have said the eviction and his sentencing were not
related to his testimony.
Speaking to reporters after the hearing, Wa Lone said he
was hopeful that “fortunate things” might happen at the next hearing.
“I completely believe the truth will come out,” he said.
Press freedom and human rights activists around the world
have rallied on behalf of the imprisoned reporters, with the United Nations and
several Western countries calling for their release.
Diplomats from Germany, Australia and the United States,
observed the proceedings on Monday.