Ensure
Refugees’ Security, Basic Rights, Equal Access to Citizenship
A refugee
from camp 27 said, “The Myanmar delegation visited last month and made many
assurances, but we would be foolish to return now because then they will never
fulfill our rights.”
(New York-HRW)
– The Myanmar and Bangladesh governments should suspend plans to repatriate
Rohingya refugees until returns are safe, voluntary, and dignified, Human
Rights Watch said today. With new repatriations set to start on August 22,
2019, Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh camps protested that they will face the
same violence and oppression in Myanmar that they fled.
Myanmar
authorities have verified 3,454 people for an initial round of returns from a
list of 22,000 submitted by Bangladesh authorities. The United Nations refugee
agency, UNHCR, and Bangladesh authorities said they are seeking to confirm that
these refugees wish to return.
“Myanmar
has yet to address the systematic persecution and violence against the
Rohingya, so refugees have every reason to fear for their safety if they
return,” said Meenakshi Ganguly, South Asia director. “Bangladesh has been
generous with the Rohingya – though conditions in the camps have been difficult
– but no refugee should feel compelled to return to a place that isn’t safe.”
After the
UN began the consultation process, many Rohingya refugees told Human Rights
Watch that while they wished to go home to Myanmar eventually, current
conditions made their return unsafe. Many of the refugees on the initial lists
refused to attend the consultations.
Read
also: 61 NGOs warn of worsening crisis in Myanmar; call for refugees’
engagement on safe, voluntary returns https://lnkd.in/gFVBwn3
Bangladesh
should not join this dangerous rush to send refugees back to conditions that
they may be forced to flee again. Meenakshi Ganguly South Asia Director
“We know
that thousands of Rohingya back in Myanmar are still in detention camps,” one
refugee told Human Rights Watch, referring to an estimated 125,000 Rohingya who
have been confined to open-air camps in central Rakhine State since 2012. “If
those people are released and return to their villages, then we will know it is
safe to return and will go back home.”
A refugee
from camp 26 who was on the list with six family members said, “We do not want
to go back to Myanmar where so many of our loved ones did not even get a
funeral, and ended up in mass graves after they were killed.”
Read also: Prevent Forced Returns, Protect Rohingya Refugees https://lnkd.in/g2q_xR9
Read also: Prevent Forced Returns, Protect Rohingya Refugees https://lnkd.in/g2q_xR9
A woman
living in camp 24 said: “This is the second time I have fled here in
Bangladesh. My husband was killed by the [Myanmar] military.… I don’t want to
go back because I don’t want to my grandchildren to face the same risk that I
did.”
The
refugees held protests after the repatriation plan was announced demanding that
those responsible for atrocities be held to account. They also called on the
Myanmar government to guarantee full citizenship rights and return land and
properties to the refugees, including compensation for homes and businesses
that the military burned.
More than
740,000 Rohingya Muslims have fled to Bangladesh since August 2017 to escape
the Myanmar military’s campaign of ethnic cleansing and crimes against
humanity. They joined about 200,000 refugees who had fled previous waves of
violence and persecution. A UN-backed fact-finding mission found “sufficient
information to warrant the investigation and prosecution of senior officials in
the Tatmadaw [armed forces] on charges of genocide.”
Bangladesh
and Myanmar previously attempted repatriation in November 2018, initiated
without consulting UNHCR or the Rohingya. Refugees on the list for return went
into hiding and refused to leave, fearing for their lives. In July 2019,
Myanmar officials arrived at the sprawling refugee settlement in Cox’s Bazar to
discuss repatriation, but denied Rohingya citizenship claims and instead
promoted a digitized National Verification Card (NVC) process.
Read also
“unwise & unethical repatriation”: https://lnkd.in/gwGtYwm
Bangladesh
authorities said they are preparing for repatriation. “Repatriation may start
any moment,” Foreign Secretary Shahidul Haque said recently. “In the next few
weeks we shall encourage the Rohingyas to go back.” Ko Ko Naing, director
general of Myanmar’s Disaster Management Department, said that reception
centers had been set up at Nga Khu Ya and Taung Pyo Letwe in Rakhine State to
receive 300 people a day, and that the refugees would initially be placed at a
temporary camp in Hla Poe Kaung before they are sent back to their villages.
The “reception centers” and “transit camp” are surrounded by barbed-wire perimeter
fences and security outposts, similar to the physical confinement structures in
the central Rakhine camps.
UN
officials said they have not had enough time to survey the refugees who have
been cleared for repatriation to find out whether they want to return to
Myanmar. UNHCR as well as Bangladesh authorities have asserted that any returns
will be voluntary.
A refugee
who was called by Bangladesh camp authorities to meet with UNHCR said she told
the refugee agency that she and her family do not want to return to Myanmar
yet. Holding a leaflet with a list of demands, she said:
They
[Myanmar authorities] always abuse us in different ways. Why would we go back
to that country to endure the same cycle of abuse. If we are recognized as
Rohingya, given citizenship, our lands, and assurance of freedom of movement,
then no one will need to send us back. We will go ourselves.
Some
Hindu refugees said that they would like to return to Myanmar, but their names
were not on the initial list. Shishu Pal Shil, the Hindu camp majhi (leader),
told Human Rights Watch: “When we came to know about the repatriation of the
Rohingya Muslims, I asked when our name will come in the list. He said possibly
in the next round. We are always ready to go back to Myanmar.”
Conditions
in Rakhine State are not conducive for voluntary, safe, or dignified
repatriation of Rohingya. The remaining Rohingya population in Rakhine State is
confined to camps and villages with no basic freedoms, subject to ongoing state
persecution and violence. The Myanmar government has taken no action to improve
conditions or address the root causes of the crisis, including systematic
persecution and violence, statelessness, and military impunity for grave
violations.
Since
November 2018, fighting between the Myanmar military and the Arakan Army armed
group in Rakhine State has displaced at least 27,000 people. Since June,
internet services have been shut down in eight townships in Rakhine State and
one township in neighboring Chin State where there is fighting between the
Arakan Army forces and Myanmar military.
Although
Bangladesh is not a party to the UN Refugee Convention, it is bound under
customary international law not to forcibly return refugees to a place where
they would face persecution, torture, other ill-treatment, or death. Any
repatriation plan should follow international standards and be developed with consultation
and informed consent from Rohingya refugees, with objective, up-to-date, and
accurate information about conditions in areas of return, including security
conditions, assistance, and protection to reintegrate.
“Many
Rohingya have said that they would like to return to Myanmar so long as they
don’t suffer the same abuse, indignities, and atrocities they have endured in
the past,” Ganguly said. “Bangladesh should not join this dangerous rush to
send refugees back to conditions that they may be forced to flee again.”