Denied
freedom of movement and facing desperate conditions, Rohingya are turning to
smugglers to escape Rakhine State, in journeys that often end in arrest and
imprisonment.
By
FRONTIER
“THOUGH
I was arrested, I want to try again to go to Malaysia,” said Ko Too Aung, a
Rohingya who was detained in 2017 while being smuggled out of Rakhine State.
Too
Aung, 24, was among six Rohingya arrested at a checkpoint in southern Rakhine’s
Ann Township. They were each sentenced to two years’ imprisonment under the
1949 Residents of Burma Registration Act because they had no proof of identity
or citizenship.
Too
Aung had left home without telling his parents, after a pwe za (broker)
promised him a job in Malaysia and offered to arrange to get him there. It was
a dream that landed Too Aung in prison and his family deeper in debt.
Too
Aung, who lives at Aleh Ywar village in Rakhine’s north-central Kyauktaw
Township, told Frontier that there was no work in his village but he was unable
to leave legally because of heavy government-enforced restrictions on movement
that apply to most Rohingya. He had hoped to earn a decent living after
arriving in Malaysia, where about 100,000 Rohingya live as refugees in relative
freedom and safety.
Despite
the Malaysian government’s refusal to grant refugees the right to work or
access to state education and benefits, many of them are able to do menial jobs
in the informal sector and receive help in accessing housing and other forms of
support from an array of charities and non-government organisations.
Too
Aung said his broker was a Muslim man from Kyauktaw town, who had arranged for
him and the other five Rohingya to be transported by car to Yangon.
Whether
working as people smugglers, with the informed consent of those transported out
of Rakhine, or engaging in more exploitative forms of smuggling that could
qualify as human trafficking, these fixers are uniformly called “brokers” by
local residents. This reflects the blurred line between consent and volition,
on one side, and deception and exploitation, on the other, where desperate
Muslim youth in Rakhine are concerned.
Had
Too Aung’s journey not ended at an Ann police checkpoint, he would have been
required to pay K2 million (US$1,370) to the broker once he reached Yangon.
From there, the broker would have arranged road transport to Mawlamyine, the
Mon State capital, where the plan was to take a boat up the Gyaing River in the
direction of Myawaddy, a town on the Thai border opposite Mae Sot, where
another broker would have demanded K3 million ($2,050) more in exchange for
continuing his journey through Thailand to Malaysia.
“I
didn’t expect to be arrested at the checkpoint,” he said. “I’ll make another
attempt to go to Malaysia and I hope it will be successful.”
Mass prosecutions
Too
Aung’s story is typical of many young Muslims in Rakhine who, denied any legal
routes to escape the poverty and discrimination they endure in their villages
or camps for internally displaced persons, put their fate in the hands of
smugglers in exchange for thousands of dollars.
Once
in transit, they risk physical abuse from smugglers eager to extort more money
from their parents, and also a high likelihood of arrest, after which they are
speedily prosecuted and imprisoned – in most cases for two years – and
portrayed in the Myanmar media as illegal immigrants for travelling within the
country of their birth.
In
an article titled “Refugees or illegal immigrants?”, published in the Burmese
edition of the Myanmar Times on January 3, writer Nay Win Than argued, “these
cases of people immigrating illegally and without authorisation into our
country need to be handled strictly according to the existing laws.” Reflecting
a common perception that the Muslim Rohingya represent a demographic threat to
Myanmar’s Buddhist majority, he asked, “How do we control these people who have
over 30 people in their average households?”
Nay
Win Than cited the arrest on December 15 of 173 Rohingya on board a vessel in
the waters off southern Tanintharyi Region, who have since been returned to
Rakhine without being prosecuted, alongside the more common arrests of Rohingya
like Too Aung, who are caught while being smuggled in groups out of Rakhine
through Ayeyarwady and Bago regions, and who are duly hit with criminal
charges. In recent months, Myanmar’s courts have staged a series of mass
prosecutions of such groups, along with some of the boat crew and bus drivers
who transported them.
On
November 29, a group of 96 Rohingya, including 25 children, were arrested after
disembarking from a boat near the beach resort town of Chaung Thar in
Ayeyarwady Region. Of this group, 93 are being tried at Pathein Township Court,
including all but two of the children, for travelling without valid identity
papers under the 1949 Residents of Burma Registration Act.
Two
earlier cases in Ayeyarwady Region were dealt with more summarily. On September
27, 30 people, including nine children, were arrested after disembarking at Nga
Yoke Kaung beach in southwestern Ngapudaw Township.
Advocate
Daw Thazin Myat Myat Win, who is representing those arrested near Chaung Thar,
told Frontier that those arrested at Nga Yoke Kaung were not allowed to retain
lawyers. They were sentenced just a week after their arrest, the 21 adults
receiving two years’ imprisonment with hard labour under the 1949 law.
Eight
of the children, who are in their teens, must also serve two years – the five
girls at a vocational school and the three boys at a youth rehabilitation
centre, both in Yangon Region (their confinement was covered in a November 8
Frontier article, “Rohingya children locked up in Yangon for travelling without
ID”). The remaining child, aged six, is under the supervision of the Department
of Social Welfare while his mother serves her two-year sentence. All will be
returned to Rakhine after completing their sentences.
Lawyer
Daw Chaw Su Htwe told Frontier on January 6 that the Pathein District Court had
rejected an appeal against the sentences, lodged on the grounds that the speed
of the trial had breached fair trial rights and that the judge had punitively
opted for the maximum prison sentence under the law. A further appeal is before
the regional High Court.
On
November 20, 22 people were caught at Shwe Thaung Yan beach in Pathein
Township. The eight children in the group were sentenced just three days later,
to two years at the vocational and rehabilitation centres in Yangon. The adults
underwent only a slightly longer trial, being sentenced to two years’
imprisonment on December 5. Chaw Su Htwe said an appeal against the sentences
was before the district court.
A
further case is underway at the Bago Township Court, where seven Rohingya who
were arrested on the evening of November 8 at the Shwe Than Lwin toll gate in
Hpa Yar Gyi, Bago Region, while travelling in a car are being prosecuted for a
different immigration offence – that of entering Myanmar without a visa or immigration
permit, which carries a maximum five-year prison sentence under the 1947 Burma
Immigration (Emergency Provisions) Act.
Police
said those arrested were from Maungdaw Township in northern Rakhine and
intended to travel to Malaysia. Among the seven was a family of four – a mother
and her children aged nine, seven and six, who were travelling to join the
father. The judge barred Frontier from attending a December 12 hearing at the
township court.
Meanwhile,
two drivers from Yangon who were employed to transport the 30 Rohingya arrested
at Nga Yoke Kaung are being prosecuted under section 367 of the Penal Code,
which prescribes a maximum 10-year prison sentence for “kidnapping or abducting
in order to subject [a] person to grievous hurt [or] slavery”. Another driver
and a woman considered an intermediary are on the run. Also being tried for the
same Penal Code offence are six boat crew and six bus drivers and assistants
who were paid to transport the 96 Rohingya arrested near Chaung Thar.
Conspicuously
absent from the law courts, though, are the brokers who arranged their journeys
and the police and government officials in Rakhine who allowed them to pass out
of a heavily policed state.
An
officer at Ngapudaw Township Police Station, who asked not to be named,
admitted to Frontier that the drivers being prosecuted in the Nga Yote Kaung
case were low-level operatives in the smuggling network and that the
ringleaders and even mid-level players remained at large. He said they had
confessed to being paid K4 million to take the smuggled Rohingya to Yangon’s
outer western Hlaing Tharyar Township.
“These
guys are nothing, just a small part in the smuggling ring. But they knew the
job at hand and who they had to take to Yangon. That’s why we charged them under
the Penal Code, not the anti-trafficking law,” he said in reference to the 2005
Anti-Trafficking in Persons Law, which has not been applied in any of the cases
involving Rohingya.
The
arrests appear to have spooked some of those involved in trafficking Rohingya
abroad, however. Daw Khin Win, a broker who recruits workers from villages in
Mon and Kayin states to work informally in two factories across the Thai border
in Mae Sot, told Frontier that a police officer whom she regularly bribed had
advised her in the second week of December to temporarily halt her business
because of increased scrutiny of illegal border crossings, which he said was
prompted by higher-level concern over the smuggling of Rohingya.
Bleak conditions
Though
smugglers have so far faced few consequences, the recent slew of arrests and
prosecutions of their human cargo suggest that the racket for smuggling
Rohingya out of Rakhine is not a well-oiled machine. It appears that any
collusion between smugglers and government officials and police is largely
confined to local townships in Rakhine, which Rohingya who pay the required
sums have little trouble leaving, despite the formal restrictions on movement,
but is less apparent further along the route or up the national chain of
command.
U
Mon Sut, the administrator for Yadanarpon village tract, which contains Too Aung’s
village of Aleh Ywar, told Frontier that more than half of the young people
from the village tract who had engaged brokers to travel to Malaysia had been
caught along the way, but that the gradual exodus would continue – both because
of the bleak conditions in Rakhine and the far better livelihood opportunities
in Malaysia.
“The
brokers’ networks are large and they have links with businesses owned by
Rohingya [in Malaysia],” he said. As a result, many of the Rohingya
successfully smuggled to Malaysia can expect to begin jobs right away, however
badly paid and insecure by Malaysian standards.
Mon
Sut said many Rohingya had left Rakhine after the Buddhist-Muslim riots in
2012. The violence displaced more than 140,000 people, the overwhelming
majority of whom were Rohingya Muslims. Most of them remain confined to heavily
guarded camps that they are unable to leave without government permission,
which is often difficult and expensive to obtain.
However,
those Rohingya who remain in their villages also have their movements
restricted by an extensive network of military and police checkpoints, where
they are also liable to be abused and extorted, according to human rights
groups.
Tens
of thousands left Rakhine in overcrowded boats in the years up till 2015, when
a crisis involving stranded boats and the discovery of mass graves on transit
routes in Thailand forced Southeast Asian governments to crack down on regional
smuggling and trafficking syndicates.
Since
then, sporadic boat departures have taken place but, according to accounts
heard by Frontier, most Rohingya wishing to escape from villages and camps in
Rakhine are taken on a largely overland route that either leaves the state via
the Rakhine Yoma mountain range, progressing through Magway and Bago regions,
or begins with a boat trip down the coast to southern Rakhine or Ayeyarwady
Region, where they are transferred to buses or cars. From Magway, Bago and
Ayeyarwady regions, they travel past Yangon to Myawaddy, where their journey
continues through Thailand to Malaysia.
Sources
in Rakhine described a market rate of about K2 million to be smuggled to
Yangon, where some are able to be absorbed into an unknown number of Rohingya
living undocumented in the city, and K4-5 million to be taken to Malaysia, seemingly
the most popular destination.
Rooted in statelessness
The
number of people being smuggled is hard to gauge, and Frontier heard wildly
varying estimates from sources on the ground. Some sources estimated that about
half of those who attempt to leave Rakhine State manage to reach their
destination, and the cases reported in the media are likely to represent just a
fraction of the overall number who are smuggled each year.
The
government, though, appears to have no collated figures. Police Colonel Myo Thu
Soe, spokesperson for the Anti-Human Trafficking Police Task Force, told
Frontier that because “this is not human trafficking, it is people smuggling”,
questions should be directed to the Department of Immigration.
U
Myo Thein Zaw, the acting administrator of Kyauktaw Township, where many known
smuggling cases originate, told Frontier he did not know about people smuggling
and also said any questions should be directed to the immigration department.
The
immigration department in Nay Pyi Taw told Frontier to contact township
branches of the department. Frontier phoned the department’s offices in
Kyauktaw and Ann townships, who said they had no data to share.
Mon
Sut said the numbers being smuggled had increased further following attacks on
security posts in northern Rakhine by the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army in
October 2016, which invited reprisals by the Myanmar military that sent tens of
thousands of Rohingya fleeing to safety in neighbouring Bangladesh. A second,
much larger series of coordinated attacks by the Rohingya militants prompted a
more severe military crackdown, which led more than 700,000 Rohingya to flee
across the border.
However,
Mon Sut said that though Rohingya who remain in Rakhine fear being attacked by
the Tatmadaw or Tatmadaw-armed Rakhine militias, the biggest motivation in
turning to people smugglers is the immiseration of Rohingya communities under
conditions where they face steep barriers to accessing livelihoods, healthcare
and education. “Rohingya people need livelihood opportunities,” he said.
“Otherwise, nothing will change.”
The
restrictions imposed on Rohingya are rooted in their statelessness. The
government does not consider the Rohingya among Myanmar’s native groups, who
are automatically eligible for citizenship. Though older generations possessed
identity cards that conferred citizenship rights, such as the three-fold
National Registration Cards, which are now obsolete, today few Rohingya hold
the Citizenship Scrutiny Cards (confusingly nicknamed “National Registration
Cards”, or “NRCs”) or Naturalised Citizenship Scrutiny Cards that denote
citizenship and allow unrestricted travel within Myanmar.
The
government has made freedom of movement contingent on Rohingya applying for an
intermediary document called the National Verification Card. However, many
Rohingya have refused to apply because the process requires them to effectively
identify as immigrants – a copy of the application form seen by Frontier asks
for the “date and place of arrival in Myanmar” – and bars them from identifying
as Rohingya.
The
card is also no proof of citizenship, eligibility for which would still be
assessed according to the 1982 Citizenship Law, which excludes Rohingya as a
non-recognised Myanmar ethnic group. NVC holders must also receive government
permission via an arduous (and reportedly expensive) bureaucratic process for
each trip they wish to make outside of Rakhine.
However,
possessing an NVC does appear to offer some form of protection if caught while
undertaking unauthorised travel outside of Rakhine. One of the 96 Rohingya
arrested near Chaung Thar in November was reportedly released from detention
because she was found to have an NVC – though she had to return to Rakhine
rather than continue her journey.
The camp
Too
Aung and the five other Rohingya arrested at the Ann Township checkpoint in
2017 served their jail sentences at the prison in Kyaukphyu Township and on
release were sent to the township’s Kyauktalone camp for internally displaced
people, which hosts more than 1,000 Muslims from the Rohingya and Kaman ethnic
groups. After a short stay at the camp, they were allowed to return to their
villages.
Frontier
visited the camp in December and met camp leader U Phyu Chay, who said that
almost every week Rohingya who had been intercepted while taking
broker-arranged trips were sent to the camp after serving their time in
Kyaukphyu Prison. The International Committee of the Red Cross provided funds
to enable them to return to their home villages, he said.
A
group of six such people, originally from Maungdaw Township, arrived at the
camp in early December. The group included U Shawfee Khan, 35, from Maungdaw’s
Shwe Zar village, who told Frontier that, on release from prison, he and other
Rohingya were presented with National Verification Cards.
At
Kyauktalone camp, Frontier also met Ko Ali Husayn, 21, originally from Kyauktaw
Township’s Zay village. Towards the start of their long journey to Malaysia, he
and two friends had been abandoned by their brokers in the jungle in Ann
Township, in the mountains that divide Rakhine and Magway Region. The two
brokers had taken a more unconventional payment from the boys of two new
motorbikes and K200,000 in cash, total.
He
said he and his two friends had been unfortunate to encounter personnel from
the township immigration department in Ann after they emerged from the jungle.
“They took us to their office and asked us where we were going,” he said. After
the three men were unable to produce identity documents, they were held at the
township police station for a month and seven days before a hearing in the
local court at which they were quickly sentenced to two years at Kyaukphyu
Prison, Ali said.
To
Ali’s knowledge, the brokers who had taken the motorbikes and their money were
not arrested. He said he had no intention of making another attempt to travel
to Malaysia. Ko Habed Ahmed, 19, who was arrested alongside Ali, said the same.
“I will go back to my village and work as a farmer,” he told Frontier.
However,
besides the many who are arrested and imprisoned, a huge toll is taken on the
families they leave behind, who are not only separated from their loved ones
but are frequently forced to sell vital assets, including farmland, in order to
pay off the brokers.
In
several accounts heard by Frontier, brokers had persuaded youths to undertake
the journeys without their parents’ knowledge, leaving at night. Several days
later, the parents received a phone call from the brokers, who told them they
were holding their children at an isolated location along the route, and
demanded payment via local intermediaries to continue the journey – or else
they would abandon their children or beat them.
On
December 19, Frontier spoke on the phone to a man named Kanful from Yadanarpon
village tract in Kyauktaw.
In
July, his daughter and granddaughter had left home without his knowledge,
hoping to reach Malaysia via Thailand with the help of a broker. Not long
after, he received a phone call from his daughter: the women, along with a
youth from the same village, were being held in a forest in Magway. She said
the brokers were demanding K1 million to continue the journey, and begged
Kanful to pay up.
Over
the following months, he received regular demands for more money: K3 million
when they got to Myawaddy, another K4 million when they were on their way from
Thailand to Malaysia. Once, a car driver called him, asking for an extra K1
million.
Each
time, he agreed to pay, as did the family of the youth who had also been held
in the forest in Magway. “A broker would come to the village to pick up the
money. We had to mortgage all the land we had to give it to them,” he said.
“Smugglers would abuse the children if we did not give them the money.”
Not
long before speaking to Frontier, he had received word that his daughter and
granddaughter had been detained by authorities in Thailand. Kanful is now deep
in debt, and he has no idea where they are being held, or what will happen to
them. “I’m so sad,” he said, “that they couldn’t make it to Malaysia.”